Wednesday 4 March 2009

Saturday 21 February 2009

Saturday 14 February 2009

Ghost Evp Results..Grand Island.

I put cartoon captions over the EVP`s to make them easier to find..First one is about 1 minute in.


Whats interesting about the second one is it was obtained behind the kitchen courtyard.
We had earlier established a `fear cage` from the control for the extractor fans.
This `high emf` extended to 3ft circular around the control.
My brother sais its Polish but personally I believe it to be German.

Friday 13 February 2009

Our leader in a scandal?


Mr Hemmings and David Cameron enjoy a tete un tete!

This article is the subject of a legal complaint

The Conservative Party accepted £200,000 from a slot machine tycoon’s businesses shortly after calling for softer rules on arcade gambling, The Times has learnt.

Four companies linked to Trevor Hemmings gave the party £50,000 each last year. Together, this made the companies the Conservatives’ largest independent corporate sponsor at the time. Only an investment fund controlled by the party treasurer, Michael Spencer, gave more.

Mr Hemmings, 73, who owns Blackpool Tower and whose horse won the 2005 Grand National, offered counsel to David Cameron at a Tory fundraising event at Uttoxeter racecourse in November 2007, according to the Racing Post’s gossip columnist.

The first of the donations was made about the time that the Tory front bench called on the Government to soften restrictions on jackpot machines that pay out £500. The Gambling Act 2005 cut the maximum stake on these Category B3 machines from £2 to £1 and limited the number of B3s to four per premises.

On February 26 last year, Tobias Ellwood, the Tory culture spokesman, demanded a review of the rules, backing the gaming industry’s call for the stakes to return to £2 and for the limit on B3 machines to be dropped. “Family arcades are a vibrant part of many seaside towns and it is wrong that they have suffered from an unintended consequence of government legislation,” he said.

However, Category B3 machines are banned from family arcades and can be played only on premises restricted to over18s.

Northern Trust Company and Trust Inns gave the Conservatives £50,000 each before April 1 last year. The Tories reported the money to the Electoral Commission on that date but because parties have 60 days to register donations, the money could have been donated at any time from the beginning of February. Two months later the Tories told the commission that they received two more donations of £50,000, this time from Classic Lodges and Crown Leisure.

Research by The Times shows that the leisure companies Northern Trust Company, Trust Inns and Classic Lodges are ultimately owned by holding companies that list Mr Hemmings as director. The holding companies’ shares are also owned by Eva Hemmings, of Jersey; Mr Hemmings’s wife, Eva, lives in Jersey.

followup:-

Hemmings is second biggest Tory donor


Companies linked to North West-based leisure entrepreneur Trevor Hemmings are the second largest corporate donors to The Conservative Party, according to a report in The Times today.

The paper says the Tories accepted £200,000 from Northern Trust Company, Trust Inns, Classic Lodges and Crown Leisure.

The first three are ultimately owned by holding companies owned by Mr Hemmings’ wife Eva. Crown Leisure, a gaming machine company, shares a telephone number with Mr Hemmings’ private office near Chorley.

Taken together, the donation was only exceeded by an investment fund controlled by the party treasurer, Michael Spencer.

The newspaper points out that Conservative front bench spokesman Tobias Ellwood has called for lighter restrictions on Category B3 slot machines, which pay out up to £500.

It quotes David Miller, of the Association for Lobbying Transparency, as saying: “It’s a clear problem of conflict of interest. The Conservatives should just send the money back.”

A Conservative spokesman said the policy on slot machines was formulated before the donations were made.

Wierd fact ; i worked for this dude 1984-85 as casual staff.


This sort of sais it all...........................................

The locals speak hehe

Ramsey's reaction to Grand Island Hotel closure



Published Date:
12 January 2009
RAMSEY'S landmark Grand Island Hotel will close on February 9 with the loss of 18 jobs as well as an important venue for functions.
Shearwater Ltd, the company behind the hotel, plans to demolish the complex and replace it with 68 flats. It was given planning approval in principle for the development in September.

Planners also gave permission for a new hotel to be built on Mooragh Promenade, Ramsey, with the stipulation that it must be operational and trading before the Grand Island is demolished.

Shearwater spokesman Richard Grime said the company had every intention of carrying out the development 'in the fullness of time'.

He added: 'I'm not able to put any timescale on the development.'

Ramsey MHK Anne Craine said: 'I am clearly saddened by the closure of the Grand Island Hotel.

'It has been an important facility in our community for as long as most of us can remember and we all have happy memories of weddings, concerts, parties and dinners that we have enjoyed there.

'The Grand Island Hotel has been a difficult business to sustain and it has closed on several previous occasions during the past 40 years.

'Nowadays people require more from a hotel than its beautiful location and providing such varied facilities requires major investment.'

She added: 'There is no doubt in my mind that Ramsey needs a hotel and function room to draw visitors to the north and serve the local area.'

---------------

Anthony Page, 32, of Douglas:
It's a shame, but if they weren't going to close it down they would need to spend some money on it.
Generally, I think hotels in the Isle of Man are quite poor compared with the UK.
It's a shame for Ramsey — they say they will build a hotel, but in a year's time it will be forgotten about.
I haven't been there, but I believe it has seen better days.

---------------

Gill Legat, 68, of Andreas:
It's sad that the north is losing a venue like that.
The Grand Island is quite versatile normally, it stages all sorts of dos.
I've been there for lunchtime drinks, I've held my daughter's 21st party there and I've been to weddings there, so it's very sad.
It's a loss for the town, it's as though Ramsey is forgotten. Everyone's got to go to Douglas now.
I still think it should be a hotel for all those functions which are going on, not apartments. We've got plenty of apartments.

---------------

Andrew Thomas, 50, of Ramsey:
It's likely to cost more to refurbish the hotel than to rebuild it, so it's not a reasonable request to ask a developer to refurbish it.
It would be great to encourage developers by giving them an opportunity to put some money into it.
It will be good for the town in the long term — as the second town in the Island we could do with some investment.
I've been going there for as long as I can remember — it's clearly rundown.

---------------

Margaret Nowak, 65, of Ramsey:
I'm really disappointed because it's the only place in Ramsey where we have a function room.
I'm a member of the St Andrew's Society and we used to use it every year, now we don't have a facility like that in Ramsey.
At present we are using the Masonic Hall until we can find a better venue. But we don't want to go out of Ramsey.
I'd really like it to be developed as another hotel because it's in such a lovely place.

---------------

Elizabeth Stanley, 17, of Ramsey:
I think it's stupid because we haven't got another hotel in Ramsey.
I was quite surprised when I found out, but I think it was always going to happen because it's a bit of a dump — it just doesn't get the business any more.
When my dad comes over he stays there and it's always been really nice. I'd like to see another hotel on the site.

---------------

Karen Shave, 61, of Maughold:
I think it's a shame. If anything they should have made it better.
It should be redeveloped as a hotel because it's in such a good position and I think we need a good hotel in Ramsey.
I've been there twice and thought it was a bit poor, it should have been refurbished.
I've not lived here long enough to know whether it will be a loss for Ramsey.

---------------

WHAT DO YOU THINK?
Send your comments to newsviews@newsiom.co.im

YOUR COMMENTS

Yet again another example of how Ramsey is becoming a 'forgotten town'! If it doesn't get the business, let's just 'shut it down' and forget about it! Has anyone taken a walk through Parliament Street lately? Its dark, dirty and deserted with old crumbling buildings and all developers want to do is knock up another block of apartments. NOT EVERYBODY WANTS TO LIVE IN AN APARTMENT! Why isn't anybody standing up for the town folk of Ramsey and listening to what they want. We have nothing for children to do, nothing for people of all ages to do but go to the one of the 10 pubs and drink! And for a street that takes less than 5 minutes to walk down I think that pretty much sums up Ramsey! Come on MHK's! exactly what is it you stand for in a community??
LOUISE, Ramsey

I totally agree with Louise's comments about Ramsey, I am a Ramsey rate payer and resident but let's face it Ramsey is dead on its feet! Imagine if there was a new hotel built in Ramsey, what would people do when they came to our town? A friend of mine came up to Ramsey over Christmas for a drive out and a cup of tea (no where was open, she has told me that she wont waste her petrol money again). Why did they say no to the marina? Who asked for a new swimming pool with less facilities then the old pool? We spent a fortune on Quayles Hall which is hardly every used. I think we should be looking at our commissioners, to me many of them have been commissioners for years, and yes it is on a voluntary basis but come on guys, where is your imagination and drive? What Ramsey needs is businesses to return to the town so that their employees are shopping within the town on a weekly basis. When I worked in Ramsey (before I was made redundant) I shopped there and now that I work in Douglas my money stays in Douglas Let's look at Peel for example: - Community events galore, the Centenary centre fun by volunteers, great housing developments and a new marina! The place is buzzing, properties are sought after!
T

THE COMMENTS OF THE PEOLE SAYING WE WANT A GOOD HOTEL, ABOUT 7 YEARS AGO I ASKED THE RAMSEY TOWN COMMISSIONERS IF I COULD PUT IN AN APPLICATION FOR A HOTEL, CINEMA AND HEALTH SPA ON THE PEVERILL PLOT, THE ANSWER "SORRY NO DUE TO THE DIVISIONS IN THE TOWN" THAT WAS WHEN THE MARINA DEBATE WAS IN FULL SWING, NOW WE HAVE A WONDERFUL SWIMMING POOL, NOT REALLY IN KEEPING WITH THE AREA AND NOT IN THE RIGHT PLACE, BUT THAT IS MY VIEW.
PHILIP S

Sorry forgot to mention; The Grand Island has had planning for demolishing and turning into apartments for a couple of years now. So it comes as no surprise to me that the hotel has closed. The same company that owns the hotel has been encouraged to build a new hotel on the promenade, but will this happen and why should he, he is a business man not a charity and if the hotel doesn't make money then why would he want to make that investment, I certainly wouldn't!
T

Just in respect to Mr Sadds comments about his application on the Peveril Plot. This gentleman has been a long supporter of Ramsey and has always put his money where his mouth is. What a shame that the 'Divisions' of the town failed to save the community millions with the development of a new pool. Hey the rates must be gathering dust in the bank for Ramsey Town Comissioners!
T

The key to the regeneration of Ramsey is the rebuilding of the Pier.If the government can spend what will be in excess of 60 million on an airport extension so that smaller planes can land at Ronaldsway, surely money can be found for such a project.As for the condition of Parliament Street,there are too many shop units in Ramsey and conversion to private dwellings or a re-location of Government offices is in order.
ST JOHN'S ROB

I agree with all the comments here.. I work in Ramey and watch as the shops close around me.. This is ,,as has been mentioned..a dying town.. Why have more flats when there are no more jobs, nothing to do for all ages and a general feeling of being forgotten....The new swimming pool is less appealing than the old one..why on earth it had to be smaller I dont understand.. The old pool site should now be made into an all age meeting place. I have so many old age pensioners whose only time they meet someone is when they go out to buy their paper or food. Howabout a place where they can have a game of Bingo once a week at night and a couple times during the week, have a cup of tea with others etc, It could also be used as a place for dances, clubs, etc The list is endless for all ages. There should be a town meeting where ideas are put forward instead of leaving it to a bunch of penpushers who probably spend the most of their time and money in Douglas. Unfortunately the only thing here is a range of Pubs and a so called nightclub. We need to get people here and something to keep people here before its a ghost town full of drunks and druggies.
DEPRESSED, Ramsey

Please let's not talk Ramsey down – like every town centre it is facing challenges – but the Town has great things going for it: and we have some great shops, the envy of towns left only with the boring sameness of many retail areas. Yes, we need more, but the answer for those who care about Ramsey must be to spend our money here. Our new Town Hall (and library) is a fantastic resource – and community groups get excellent use from it. Our new modern swimming pool is another major investment. We have great new school buildings – designed for community use too – and they'd be the envy of towns across. The Town Commissioners have done much in recent years to improve the town environment – the hanging baskets and planters transform the Town in Spring and Summer – and the Mooragh Park is the best on the Island. Everyone can help the Town to look its best – and fight the scourge of litter which can soon make anywhere look scruffy. We just need to feel good about the place – and care passionately enough to do our bit. It is a great loss that our only hotel is closing before the replacement is built – but we all need to work hard to create reasons for people to want to stay in Ramsey – then investment should follow. The Ramsey marina project, though long in coming, should provide a great improvement to an already fantastic harbour location – a great incentive and opportunity for investment in new businesses – and extra trade for the existing ones. Regards
DAVID, Ramsey

David, I don't think any of the residents wish to 'talk Ramsey down'. I am a Ramsey girl born and bred and have chosen to live in the town all my life (bar a few years in the UK) but what we are trying to say is that with all the money being pumped into other towns around the Island ahem ahem Douglas!), Ramsey is suppose to be the second largest town on the Island and the Government seem to forget this when taking into account the voices of its community and what people want. Another fine example is the now derelict Albert Road School! What is going to happen to that? Renovate that and make it into something useful for the community. The plot of land adjacent to Albert Road - used to the old Catholic School, that has lane overgrown for over a decade! Remember the old Plaza Cinema opposite the Brit that got demolished back in the good old days, what got made of that after years of neglect? A car park! The old Arcade down the Lifeboat House – left to rot! The Peveril Plot would have been ideal for something much more useful than a new swimming pool (of which I will not go into as it's just a block of concrete with no windows!!), which beggers belief of what will become of the old pool when closed down. It seems to me that there are developers/local people with money who want to inherit their hard earned cash into rebuilding a once beaming seaside town but the powers that be seem to have a vendetta against them and anyone else with positive ideas and genuine emotion for their home town.
LOUISE, Ramsey

DAVID has some good ideas (tart up the town, get rid of the litter, etc.) but I don't think that he has addressed the root problem – where is the money coming from? Sixty years ago, Ramsey was proud of its nickname "Royal Ramsey" and those were the days when tourists used to come to stay there because there was lots to do – 2 cinemas, multi-function swimming pool/dancing complex with competitions in the Summer, shops that were up to date with their range of goods, good and clean hotels and cafés that offered reasonable food/drinks with good service......I could go on. But now there are no cinemas (people stay at home and watch "Corrie"), the new swimming pool is a dedicated concrete windowless monstrosity, the hotels and cafés, such as they are, offer food and service that is by far not the best and tourists generally stay well clear of the place. Ramsey has just not kept pace with the times which are changing increasingly rapidly. Tourists want things to do on holiday which they cannot do at home. They want to have fun in nice, smart and clean surroundings. Going on holiday to Ramsey in the vague hope that the weather will be clement enough to allow a couple of days on the beach in the sun is not an attractive thought for today's visitors. When I was at school in Ramsey, a Saturday evening's dancing in the Pool Ballroom with a live band was good fun and a great social event – that venue was also used for other functions as well (DEPRESSED's Bingo suggestion, etc.). Parliament Street needs money spending on it – lots of it – if it is to be somewhere that people will like walking along. The vast majority of shop owners need to completely reconsider what they are selling – Victorian tea-sets, low-value antiques, out-of date shoes and old clothes do not add anything to the attractiveness of the place. I am not sure about the pier – to just re-build it would not offer anything that doesn't have its roots in Victorian times and it would need a lot of imagination to make it worth visiting – fishing and skeet-shooting come to mind among other things. The hills on the way to Maughold would be ideal for an all-weather sledging run (similar to the Summer-sledging runs that they have in Austria) if we could get the Health and Safety people out of our hair and the legislation to keep them out. And above all, food outlets MUST be smartened up and staffed with people who know what potential customers want and are prepared to prepare and serve it well – that will require them to be properly trained (just getting temporary workers in from Ireland is not the answer)l. Whatever .... Ramsey needs to have money spent on it, before it will attract people who will bring their money there and spend it, to make it "shine by the sea" again. Otherwise it will remain a sad and squalid-looking dump.
PHAIDEAUX, Port Erin

What a pity! I have fond memories of staying in the Grand Island in the late 60's and even working there in the early 70's. It was a place full of characters & stories! Then it was very smart – if I remember correctly a 'Royal' actually visited the hotel for a charity function when we were there. There was a well used croquet lawn to the rear (front entrance) and we had great fun on the putting green in front of the dining room. As I sit here typing this I can even smell the fumes and hear the drone of the 2 stroke engines of the boats on the lake at Mooragh Park & can hear the sea pounding on the stoney foreshore to the front of the hotel. From memory there was also a small cabaret hall on the sea front. We even arrived on a couple of occasions to the pier in Ramsey off the ferry (cattle steamer) from Belfast. There were no roll on roll off ferries then. Cars were lifted on the boat via a rope type cradle! What a pity – time moves on and memories are sometimes all we are left with!
BRUCE, Belfast

Why is this developer set on building apartments on the site of the Grand Island? Surely it would be money well spent if the hotel was knocked down and rebuilt and maybe not just as a hotel but as a facility that can cater for all ages. Why spend money on apartments that no one will be able to afford (simply because of the view). The young people of today do not want to stay in Ramsey as there is nothing for them there so who is going to buy these apartments? If he must build apartments then he should build them down on the promenade and leave this site for a Hotel complex, one that visitors to the Island will welcome along with the beautiful views out over the sea. I am Manx born and it seems to me that the Isle of Man is slowly being taken over by foreigners and people moving over from the UK…. Where are the Manx people, why are they not supporting our Island. With regards to the new swimming pool, what a waste! My 15 yr old son went there last night and was not impressed at all, apart from the large pool was freezing there are no slides or anything just two holes of water! And to top it off he wasn't impressed that he could stand up in the deepest part of the large pool!! After looking at the Peel swimming pool you would have thought they put more effort and thought into this one. The only slide on the Island is that in the NSC, not good. Why couldn't we have a complex like the Sandcastle Waterpark in Blackpool, this caters for all ages and is not just a boring pool…….such a waste of money I think, there would have been plenty of room for something better. As for the businesses in Ramsey, this is fast becoming a problem. Without shops and cafes no-one will want to visit Ramsey, so where is the support from our local commissioners or the government! Get the priorities right and do something before it is too late. I feel very sorry for the young kids that are growing up and how bored they must be. The tedious trek of going into Douglas when they want to do anything and then this is also limited. How sad!! Come on you Manx people lets save this Island before it is just a retirement place with apartments!!
CC

Thursday 12 February 2009

Filling out the B&Q application form..

Take this test here for your own amazment lol

Your Personality Profile

Print

Thank you for completing the questionnaire. You will see your scores below, along with some written feedback.

Your scores are expressed in sten (standard ten) scores, which reflect the normal distribution of the personality factors throughout the general population.

The average scores for the general population are scores of 5 or 6 and these scores are achieved by approximately 38% of people. Scores of 4 or 7 are achieved by a further 30%, scores of 3 and 8 by 18 %, scores of 2 and 9 by 9% and scores of 1 and 10 by approximately 5%.

Although scores are described in the text as 'high' or 'low' there are no right or wrong score directions and these labels are used for purely descriptive purposes. The brief summary below gives the factors, your scores and some indication of what your scores mean.


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Agreeableness: 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 - -
Conscientiousness: 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 -
Conformity: 4 4 4 4 - - - - - -
Extroversion: 5 5 5 5 5 - - - - -
Emotional Stability: 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 - -

Agreeableness

You have obtained a score of 8 on the Agreeableness scale. This score means that you are actually quite a sensitive person. As such, you would probably be an intuitive and compassionate individual who was aware of your own and other people's emotions. You would usually be quite people-centred in your outlook and would be perceived by most people as genuine and sincere in your desire to do the best for them. You would probably be patient and supportive and willing to counsel and assist those around you. However, these aspects of your character could also mean that you sometimes found it quite difficult to deal with people who were brusque or off-hand in their manner and that might occasionally be unsettled by customers who behaved very forcefully.

Conscientiousness

You have scored 9 on the Conscientious scale. This is a high score and suggests that you are a very detail-minded individual who views order and organisation as very important qualities in the working environment. Self-discipline would probably be important to you and you would generally set yourself high standards of conduct and work. At the most basic level you would, for example, be punctual. You would be likely to expect your colleagues to share these standards and always to fulfil their commitments on time in a business-like way. Your methodical and schematic way of doing things means that you would probably be very good at most roles where you were expected to tackle tasks needing close attention.

Conformity

You have scored 4 on the Conformity scale. This suggests that you are, in all likelihood, a fairly unorthodox person who occasionally likes to be something of a non-conformist. You probably don't place the same high value on social convention as many of the people who work within B&Q, and some of your colleagues might see you as too informal in your dealings with customers. You're likely to be a fairly flexible and original thinker who would sometimes produce new and different ideas. You may well have an enquiring streak that means you are interested in many topics. When possible you probably try to introduce some form of innovation into the working environment and this could mean that you find the emphasis placed by your B&Q colleagues on following procedures was a little restrictive.

Extroversion

Your score of 5 on the Extroversion scale is average and indicates that you are likely to be fairly outgoing and friendly with a personable and sociable nature. Even so, when starting a new role it would probably take you a few weeks to fully settle in and establish good interpersonal relationships with your colleagues. However, despite the fact that you would probably enjoy the social aspects of working within a team, you might not always be as responsive to customers as many of the people who work for B&Q.

You probably have a degree of natural enthusiasm that would be stimulated and maintained by some variety at work. However, you would still value some routine and predictability in a job because of the stability that would offer, and might not enjoy the more hectic aspects of working in a B&Q store at busy times.

Emotional Stability

Your score of 8 on the Emotional Stability scale suggests that you are generally a fairly confident and optimistic person who would express your thoughts and ideas openly in most situations. You have quite a strong character which means that you could probably be quite assertive if you thought that you needed to be.

You're likely to be quite enthusiastic and would probably approach your work with a fair degree of ambition. You would probably be fairly decisive in most situations and if confronted with problems at work you would generally be able to make most decisions on your own without asking for help from your superiors. You are, in all probability, quite resistant to work related stress. Indeed, not only could you cope with most pressure, you might actually find that a limited amount of stress at work acted as a good motivating force.

Print

Exit application process